Peer Evaluation Sample

Sample Peer Evaluation of a Speech I’m going to analyze Jane Doe’s speech on the benefits of music for individuals and the positive impact it has. Jane got everyone’s attention by beginning with a personal story about how music influenced her life.

Music has always been Jane’s passion and it was inspiring to see her talk about something she is so enthusiastic about.

The rest of Jane’s speech was very well-organized and she made some excellent points about how music can benefit people in various ways. Her use of rhetorical questions was particularly effective in getting the audience to think about her arguments.

One thing I would criticize Jane on is her use of philosophical terminology. In particular, she used the term “ontology” when discussing how music can create a sense of belonging for people. While this is technically accurate, it is not a term that will be familiar to most people in the audience. As a result, it sounded like Jane was showing off her knowledge rather than actually communicating her ideas.

Overall, I thought Jane’s speech was very good. She was enthusiastic and made some excellent points about the benefits of music. With a few tweaks, it could have been even better.

The second speech I am going to evaluate is John Doe’s speech about the importance of voting. John started out by giving some statistics about voting rates in the United States, which immediately grabbed the audience’s attention.

He then went on to discuss the various reasons why people might not vote, such as feeling that their vote doesn’t matter or being too busy. I thought this was a very effective way of getting the audience to empathize with people who don’t vote.

John also did a good job of refuting common excuses for not voting, such as “my vote won’t make a difference.” He ended his speech with a call to action, urging the audience to go out and vote.

Overall, I thought John’s speech was very well-reasoned and persuasive. He made some excellent points about the importance of voting and did a good job of refuting common excuses for not voting. His call to action was particularly effective.

The third speech I am going to evaluate is Sarah Doe’s speech about the negative effects of social media. Sarah started out by giving some statistics about the amount of time people spend on social media, which immediately grabbed the audience’s attention.

She then went on to discuss the various negative effects of social media, such as addiction, depression, and anxiety. I thought she did an excellent job of explaining how social media can have negative impacts on people’s lives.

Sarah also did a good job of offering solutions to the problem of social media addiction. For example, she suggested setting limits on the amount of time you spend on social media and being more mindful of how you use it.

Overall, I thought Sarah’s speech was very well-informed and eye-opening. She made some excellent points about the negative effects of social media and offered some practical solutions to the problem.

I appreciated it when she began with a narrative and example since it allowed me to grasp what she was attempting to convey to the class. She then introduced her topic, as well as her reasons for believing that everyone should own an iPod and listen to music. This was a smart approach because it was well planned and easy to understand, which helped her maintain the attention of her audience.

I also liked her use of music clips because it helped me feel more engaged in the presentation.

She then went on to talk about the different types of Music and how they affect people. She used a lot of philosophical terminology which I didn’t really understand, but I think it made her points more valid. She ended with a call to action, which was effective in getting the audience to think about what she had said.

Overall, I thought her presentation was well-organized, engaging, and thought-provoking.

Being too complicated would have distracted the class from her message. The structure of her speech was appealing to me since it was simple and straightforward. Despite the fact that she had a well-planned outline, the way she presented her case may have needed some work. To avoid missing anything vital that she wanted to say, Jane composed a paper to explain her points. This is an excellent method to stay organized; nevertheless, while reading off her paper word-by-word, she kept her head down most of the time.

By looking down, she missed the opportunity to make eye contact with her audience, which would have helped engage them in her speech.

In terms of content, Jane did a great job of backing up her claims with evidence. She included several studies and expert opinions to support her position. I also liked the way she ended her speech with a call to action. Overall, I thought Jane did a good job, but there are always ways to improve.

Some suggestions for improvement include:

– Make eye contact with the audience

– Vary the tone and volume of your voice

– Use more gestures and body language

– Try not to read off of a paper too much

– Engage the audience more by asking questions or making jokes

Jane’s speech was on the topic of Music and Rhetoric. She did a good job of connecting the two concepts and explaining how they are related. I especially liked the way she used philosophical terminology to help explain her points. Overall, I thought Jane did a great job on her speech. Some suggestions for improvement include:

– Make eye contact with the audience

– Vary the tone and volume of your voice

– Use more gestures and body language

– Try not to read off of a paper too much

– Engage the audience more by asking questions or making jokes

Leave a Comment